Back to all questions
Google Ads Strategy
Does writing ad copy per ad group still matter, or has RSA made it pointless?
Client asked me why we charge for copywriting when Google assembles the ad itself, and I gave
an answer I wasn't fully satisfied with.
The steelman of their position: you supply headlines, the system picks combinations per
auction, so the craft is in supplying enough variety rather than in writing any particular
ad. Under that view, fifteen decent headlines beat five excellent ones, and per-ad-group
tailoring is effort spent on something the machine overrides anyway.
My position is that the assembly is only as good as the inputs and that specificity to the
query still wins, but I notice I believe that partly because it's what I was taught.
What are people seeing? Is tightly tailored copy still beating generic-but-plentiful, and if
so where does the difference actually show up?