Back to all questions
Answered
Performance Max
Feed quality or asset quality - which one actually moves PMax?
Client has budget for one project this quarter and I have to choose. Either we rebuild the
product feed properly - titles, attributes, the images that are currently whatever the
supplier sent - or we produce a proper set of creative assets, which for them means a
photoshoot.
My instinct says feed, because the feed is what decides which queries you are eligible for
in the first place and no amount of good creative rescues a product Google does not
understand. But the creative agency in the room says assets, and they're not obviously
wrong: the auto-generated combinations are poor and the shopping listings look identical to
every competitor selling the same catalogue.
Has anyone done both and can say which one moved the number? I'm aware the honest answer
might be "the one you're currently worse at".